On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 11:57:17AM +0800, Jay Fang wrote: > On 2021/3/7 22:36, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 07:56:11PM +0800, Jay Fang wrote: > > > +static int hisi_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi) > > > +{ > > > + struct hisi_spi *hs = spi_controller_get_devdata(spi->controller); > > > + struct hisi_chip_data *chip; > > > + > > > + /* Only alloc on first setup */ > > > + chip = spi_get_ctldata(spi); > > > + if (!chip) { > > > + chip = kzalloc(sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL); > > > + if (!chip) > > > + return -ENOMEM; > > > + spi_set_ctldata(spi, chip); > > > + } > > [...] > > > + master = devm_spi_alloc_master(dev, 0); > > > > It would seem simpler to just pass "sizeof struct hisi_chip_data" > > to devm_spi_alloc_master(), thus obviating the need to allocate > > it on first invocation of the ->setup hook. > > Thanks for your review. "struct hisi_chip_data" is the private data > of per-spi device, not the spi controller. So I think this method > is not suitable here. Maybe we can allocate "struct hisi_spi" in > this way. Ah, I was mistaken then. Yes, allocating struct hisi_spi with devm_spi_alloc_master() would probably make sense. Thanks, Lukas