Re: [PATCH] [v2] spi: rockchip: avoid objtool warning

[Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 6:01 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Building this file with clang leads to a an unreachable code path
> causing a warning from objtool:
>
> drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.o: warning: objtool: rockchip_spi_transfer_one()+0x2e0: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame
>
> Change the unreachable() into an error return that can be
> handled if it ever happens, rather than silently crashing
> the kernel.
>
> Fixes: 65498c6ae241 ("spi: rockchip: support 4bit words")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>

Thanks for the v2!
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> v2: use 'return' instead of 'BUG()'
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c | 13 ++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
> index 936ef54e0903..0d75080da648 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
> @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static int rockchip_spi_prepare_dma(struct rockchip_spi *rs,
>         return 1;
>  }
>
> -static void rockchip_spi_config(struct rockchip_spi *rs,
> +static int rockchip_spi_config(struct rockchip_spi *rs,
>                 struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_transfer *xfer,
>                 bool use_dma, bool slave_mode)
>  {
> @@ -521,7 +521,9 @@ static void rockchip_spi_config(struct rockchip_spi *rs,
>                  * ctlr->bits_per_word_mask, so this shouldn't
>                  * happen
>                  */
> -               unreachable();
> +               dev_err(rs->dev, "unknown bits per word: %d\n",
> +                       xfer->bits_per_word);
> +               return -EINVAL;
>         }
>
>         if (use_dma) {
> @@ -554,6 +556,8 @@ static void rockchip_spi_config(struct rockchip_spi *rs,
>          */
>         writel_relaxed(2 * DIV_ROUND_UP(rs->freq, 2 * xfer->speed_hz),
>                         rs->regs + ROCKCHIP_SPI_BAUDR);
> +
> +       return 0;
>  }
>
>  static size_t rockchip_spi_max_transfer_size(struct spi_device *spi)
> @@ -577,6 +581,7 @@ static int rockchip_spi_transfer_one(
>                 struct spi_transfer *xfer)
>  {
>         struct rockchip_spi *rs = spi_controller_get_devdata(ctlr);
> +       int ret;
>         bool use_dma;
>
>         WARN_ON(readl_relaxed(rs->regs + ROCKCHIP_SPI_SSIENR) &&
> @@ -596,7 +601,9 @@ static int rockchip_spi_transfer_one(
>
>         use_dma = ctlr->can_dma ? ctlr->can_dma(ctlr, spi, xfer) : false;
>
> -       rockchip_spi_config(rs, spi, xfer, use_dma, ctlr->slave);
> +       ret = rockchip_spi_config(rs, spi, xfer, use_dma, ctlr->slave);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
>
>         if (use_dma)
>                 return rockchip_spi_prepare_dma(rs, ctlr, xfer);
> --
> 2.29.2
>


-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers