On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 12:31 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 07:08:20PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
>
> > - if (xfer->tx_buf || xfer->rx_buf) {
> > + if ((xfer->tx_buf || xfer->rx_buf) && xfer->len) {
>
> I think the issue here is more that some users were passing in buffers
> with zero length transfers, the above check was already intended to
> catch this case but was working on the assumption that if there was
> nothing to transfer then no buffer would be provided.
Fair enough, maybe it makes sense to move the check into __spi_validate() and
propagate an error upwards?
Regads,
Nicolas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
