Re: [PATCH 05/10] dma: tx49 removal

[Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:10:38AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-01-05 at 15:02 +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/txx9dmac.h b/drivers/dma/txx9dmac.h
> []
> > @@ -26,11 +26,6 @@
> >   * DMA channel.
> >   */
> >  
> > 
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_TX49XX
> > -static inline bool txx9_dma_have_SMPCHN(void)
> > -{
> > -	return true;
> > -}
> >  #define TXX9_DMA_USE_SIMPLE_CHAIN
> >  #else
> >  static inline bool txx9_dma_have_SMPCHN(void)
> 
> This doesn't look like it compiles as there's now an #else
> without an #if

you are right, no idea what I had in mind while doing that.

Vinod,

as this patch series found a still active user of the platform,
could you drop the patch from your tree, or do you want a revert
from me ?

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]