Hi Nemoto-san, On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:18 AM Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 21:41:24 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Is that sufficient to keep it? > >> > >> for me it is. But now we probaly need some reverts then... > > > > Indeed. Fortunately not all of it, as some removals were TX4938-only. > > These patches should not break RBTX4927: > > net: tc35815: Drop support for TX49XX boards > spi: txx9: Remove driver > mtd: Remove drivers used by TX49xx > char: hw_random: Remove tx4939 driver > rtc: tx4939: Remove driver > ide: tx4938ide: Remove driver Indeed. > And these patches just break audio-support only. > > dma: tx49 removal > ASoC: txx9: Remove driver > > I think dma and ASoC drivers are hard to maintain now, and can be > dropped for basic support for RBTX4927. > (TX39 boards does not have audio-support, so dma txx9 driver can be > dropped too) Agreed, I don't test audio anyway, but I know it used to work (I had intended to use the board as an MPD media server, but never got beyond the prototyping phase). Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds