Re: [PATCH] spi: dt-bindings: clarify CS behavior for spi-cs-high and gpio descriptors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Andreas,

> Am 09.12.2020 um 21:01 schrieb Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:04:26 -0500
> Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 1:16 PM H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> This is also what made me wonder if that is really intended because then
>>> the whole discussion about the cs-gpio-flags and inversion and the fixes
>>> would not have been needed. The current code and fixes are all about
>>> not ignoring the flags...  
>> 
>> The inversion you witnessed was a bug caused by spi client drivers that
>> simply "plow over" the SPI_CS_HIGH mode flag. This includes the panel driver
>> you're using, see:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-tpo-td028ttec1.c?h=v5.10-rc6#n337
>> 
> ah, it would be set in spi->mode and is cleared by
> 
> spi->mode = SPI_MODE_3;
> 
> 
> Hmm, but we have
>                      spi-cpol;
>                        spi-cpha;
> in devicetree. Why do we need that spi->mode line at all?

Because it is there in almost all or at least many drivers.

But I have tested with 

> spi->mode |= SPI_MODE_3;

which should keep the mode intact. Right? That did not work either.

So let's not derail the discussion by moving to the code of some
specific driver. Even if that is wrong it does not solve what
this patch wants to solve.

BR and thanks,
Nikolaus





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux