On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 02:22:20PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 05:20:00PM +0300, Maxim Kochetkov wrote: > > > Should I resend it? > > If the patch isn't actually applied then yes. Do you frequently send out emails that you've applied a patch and then not apply it?
Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Use max_native_cs instead of num_chipselect to set SPI_MCR
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Use max_native_cs instead of num_chipselect to set SPI_MCR
- From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 01:55:34 +0200
- Cc: Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@xxxxxxxx>, linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20201202142220.GE5560@sirena.org.uk>
- References: <20201201085916.63543-1-fido_max@inbox.ru> <160683107678.35139.1439064414776102118.b4-ty@kernel.org> <e19002f8-a8a8-6201-6680-ef0b586c6367@inbox.ru> <20201202142220.GE5560@sirena.org.uk>
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Use max_native_cs instead of num_chipselect to set SPI_MCR
- From: Maxim Kochetkov
- Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Use max_native_cs instead of num_chipselect to set SPI_MCR
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Use max_native_cs instead of num_chipselect to set SPI_MCR
- From: Maxim Kochetkov
- Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Use max_native_cs instead of num_chipselect to set SPI_MCR
- From: Mark Brown
- [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Use max_native_cs instead of num_chipselect to set SPI_MCR
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-geni-qcom: Use the new method of gpio CS control
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Use max_native_cs instead of num_chipselect to set SPI_MCR
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Use max_native_cs instead of num_chipselect to set SPI_MCR
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Use max_native_cs instead of num_chipselect to set SPI_MCR
- Index(es):
 |