On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:54:15AM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote: > It would still be quite nice to benefit from the flexibility of DT overlays > not only for the SPI use case. But before I come up with any custom > solution, for now I will rather have the device in the DT statically. > I just wonder if I need to keep the DT node for the device in a separate > patch in our own tree, or if a node with a custom compatible string like for > example "kontron,user-spi" would be accepted upstream, without a matching > driver? I'm having a hard time getting enthusiastic about it TBH - can you not just use spidev and live with the warning?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
