Re: Re: [PATCH] spi: Use clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare

["Qing Zhang" <zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Messages-----
&gt; From: "Mark Brown" <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
&gt; Sent Time: 2020-07-14 17:44:06 (Tuesday)
&gt; To: "Qing Zhang" <zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
&gt; Cc: linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Xuefeng Li" <lixuefeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Tiezhu Yang" <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
&gt; Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Use clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare
&gt; 
&gt; On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 05:09:14PM +0800, Qing Zhang wrote:
&gt; &gt; Convert clk_enable/clk_disable to clk_prepare_enable/clk_disable_unprepare
&gt; &gt; calls as required by common clock framework.
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; Signed-off-by: Qing Zhang <zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
&gt; &gt; ---
&gt; &gt;  drivers/spi/spi-coldfire-qspi.c | 4 ++--
&gt; 
&gt; Are you sure that ColdFire uses the common clock framework?
&gt; 
&gt; &gt;  drivers/spi/spi-omap-uwire.c    | 4 ++--
&gt; 
&gt; It makes life easier if you send per-driver patches, that makes it
&gt; easier for driver maintainers to review things and means that issues
&gt; with a change in one driver won't hold up another.


Hi Mark,


Thank you for your suggestion.

I will split this patch into two patches and then send v2. 
</zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxx></yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx></lixuefeng@xxxxxxxxxxx></zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxx></broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>