Hi Mark, On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 6:49 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 01:59:24PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 1:08 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > To repeat my previous feedback I'd expect a driver update as well. > > > No driver update is needed. > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/renesas,sh-msiof.yaml says: > > I'm much more comfortable explicitly listing the new compatible so that > even if someone makes a DT that doesn't bother listing the fallbacks > things will work. Adding all of them would cause even more churn when adding support for a new SoC... There are already more than 700 "renesas," compatible values documented that are not directly matched by drivers. Nowadays we have "make dtbs_check", so if a DTS doesn't conform to the binding, it will be flagged. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds