Re: [PATCH 01/10] x86/mm/numa: Remove uninitialized_var() usage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 11:39:05PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >> > -#define NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
> >> > +#define NODE_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS 1
> >> 
> >> but if we ever lose the 1 then the above will silently compile the code
> >> within the IS_ENABLED() section out.
> >
> > That's true, yes. I considered two other ways to do this:
> >
> > 1) smallest patch, but more #ifdef:
> > 2) medium size, weird style:
> >
> > and 3 is what I sent: biggest, but removes #ifdef
> >
> > Any preference?
> 
> From a readbility POV I surely prefer #3. i"m just wary. Add a big fat
> comment to the define might mitigate that, hmm?

Sure! I'll add it.

-- 
Kees Cook



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux