> The original changelog is perfectly fine, please stop sending these. I find this commit message improvable also according to Linux software development documentation. Regards, Markus
Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure
- From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 12:02:11 +0200
- Cc: Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@xxxxxxx>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@xxxxxxx>, Stephen McCamant <smccaman@xxxxxxx>, Qiushi Wu <wu000273@xxxxxxx>, Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20200602094947.GA5684@sirena.org.uk>
- References: <26028f50-3fb8-eb08-3c9f-08ada018bf9e@web.de> <20200602094947.GA5684@sirena.org.uk>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure
- From: Markus Elfring
- Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] spi: sprd: switch the sequence of setting WDG_LOAD_LOW and _HIGH
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: call pm_runtime_put on pm_runtime_get failure
- Index(es):
 |