On 01/06/20 12:30 pm, Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi, Mark, > > On Monday, June 1, 2020 8:47:25 AM EEST Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: >> From: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan >> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Now that cadence-quadspi has been converted to use spi-mem framework, >> move it under drivers/spi/ >> >> Update license header to match SPI subsystem style >> >> Signed-off-by: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan >> <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Vignesh >> Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/Kconfig | 11 ----------- >> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/Makefile | 1 - >> drivers/spi/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++ >> drivers/spi/Makefile | 1 + >> .../spi-cadence-quadspi.c} | 14 +++++++------- >> 5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) >> rename drivers/{mtd/spi-nor/controllers/cadence-quadspi.c => >> spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c} (99%) > > If this patch set looks good to you, would you take it through the SPI tree? > If so, I would need an immutable tag, so I can merge back in spi-nor/next in > order to fix a small conflict that will appear in drivers/mtd/spi-nor/ > controllers/Kconfig. Vignesh would have to respin this patch on top of v5.7- > rc1. With this addressed: > > Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > I have resent v3 on top of v5.7-rc1 (also applies cleanly on spi tree's for-next branch): https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/20200601070444.16923-1-vigneshr@xxxxxx/T/#t