On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 08:58:04PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-bcm2835.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-bcm2835.c > @@ -379,6 +379,10 @@ static irqreturn_t bcm2835_spi_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) > if (bs->tx_len && cs & BCM2835_SPI_CS_DONE) > bcm2835_wr_fifo_blind(bs, BCM2835_SPI_FIFO_SIZE); > > + /* check if we got interrupt enabled */ > + if (!(bcm2835_rd(bs, BCM2835_SPI_CS) & BCM2835_SPI_CS_INTR)) > + return IRQ_NONE; > + > /* Read as many bytes as possible from FIFO */ > bcm2835_rd_fifo(bs); > /* Write as many bytes as possible to FIFO */ This definitely looks wrong. The check whether the interrupt is enabled should be moved *before* the conditional calls to bcm2835_rd_fifo_blind() and bcm2835_wr_fifo_blind(), i.e. to the top of the function. Otherwise if an interrupt is raised by another SPI controller, this function may perform read/write accesses to the FIFO and interfere with an ongoing transfer in DMA or poll mode. Also, instead of performing an MMIO read, just use the "cs" variable which was assigned at the top of the function. The code comment should explain that the check is necessary because the interrupt may be shared with other controllers on the BCM2711. Finally, it would be nice if the check would be optimized away when compiling for pre-RasPi4 products, maybe something like: + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_LPAE) && !(cs & BCM2835_SPI_CS_INTR)) + return IRQ_NONE; Thanks, Lukas