On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 07:04:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 07:02:33PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 04:50:05PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > If the delay used is long enough the spi_delay_exec() will use a sleeping > > > function to implement it. Add a might_sleep() here to help avoid callers > > > using this from an atomic context and running into problems at runtime on > > > other systems. > > > > Thanks! > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > We may improve it later, though, to be smarter and spill a warning only when it > uses non-atomic delays. For now this is good enough. IMO this wouldn't be better than the current solution. might_sleep() is called "might" to warn that the called method may get to sleep, not shall, not will. As I see it it's better to warn about the consequences straight away, but not at the point when the sleeping method is actually called in the atomic context. -Sergey > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >