On 21/05/2020 09:38, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 21/05/2020 09:04, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:50 AM Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even >>> when it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on >>> the error handling path to keep the counter balanced. >> >> ... >> >>> ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev); >>> if (ret < 0) { >>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pm runtime get failed, e = %d\n", ret); >> >>> + pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev); >> >> For all your patches, please, double check what you are proposing. >> >> Here, I believe, the correct one will be _put_noidle(). >> >> AFAIU you are not supposed to actually suspend the device in case of error. >> But I might be mistaken, thus see above. >> >>> goto exit_pm_disable; >>> } > > > Is there any reason why this is not handled in pm_runtime_get itself? Ah I see a response from Rafael here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/20/1100 OK so this is intentional and needs to be fixed. Jon -- nvpublic