Re: [PATCH 00/17] spi: dw: Add generic DW DMA controller support

[Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:23:24AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:07:33PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 02:33:36PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > Please don't make new feature development dependent on conversion to the
> > > new schema format, there's quite a backlog of reviews of schema
> > > conversions so it can slow things down.  It's good to do the conversions
> > > but please do them after adding any new stuff to the binding rather than
> > > before.
> 
> > So by saying this do you want me to revert an order of the first two patches
> > in the series, right? So the series would first add the DMA properties support
> > to the binding, then would convert the binding file to DT schema.
> 
> The conversion to YAML format should be the very last thing in the patch
> series,

Hm, haven't heard about this requirement. Could you point me out to a doc or
some discussion concerning this for future reference? It's not a first DT
conversion patch I've submitted and non of them were addressed with such
request. I do understand that the order of DT concerning patches can be
important and agree to fix it by updating the original legacy binding first,
then perform a conversion. But placing the conversion in a tail of the series
just seems unnecessary. The patch can be dropped from any place of the series
if for some reason Rob would be late with review.

Personally I prefer placing all DT changes in the head of the series, so Rob
wouldn't need to search through the whole patchset looking for the DT-related
patches.

-Sergey

> and as Andy says there's another patch in flight also doing this
> conversion which you should coordinate with.