RE: [PATCH v7 RESEND 03/13] Revert "dmaengine: imx-sdma: fix context cache"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020/05/13 Fuzzey, Martin <martin.fuzzey@flowbird.group> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 08:07, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:32:26AM +0800, Robin Gong wrote:
> > > This reverts commit d288bddd8374e0a043ac9dde64a1ae6a09411d74, since
> > > 'context_loaded' finally removed.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@xxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> >
> > I think this can safely be folded into the next patch which makes it
> > more clear what is happening.
> >
> 
> Agreed,
> not only that but having 2 separate patches also means that the bug that was
> fixed by the commit being reverted could reappear during bisection.
> 
> More generally I think reverts should be reserved for commits that later turn
> out to be wrong or unneeded (ie should never really have been applied).
> If they were OK at the time but later become unnecessary due to other code
> changes I think all the related modifications should be done in a single normal
> non revert patch.
Okay, will remove it in v8.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux