Re: [PATCH 04/17] spi: dw: Cleanup generic DW DMA code namings

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 12:28 AM Serge Semin
<Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 10:43:24PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 04:29:29PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > Since from now the former Intel MID platform layer will be used
> > > as a generic DW SPI DMA module, lets alter the internal methods
> > > naming to be DMA-related instead of having the "mid_" prefix. In
> > > addition the DW PCI-DMA specific methods and structures should
> > > be named with pci-suffexes, since we'll implement the DW MMIO DMA
> > > specific functions and objects soon.
> >
> > I think we rather leave Intel Medfield things alone.  And I think I did this already in spi/for-next in less invasive way.
>
> The naming is horrible in that module.

I agree!

> Since it's going to be a generic DMA
> driver the prefixes should be correspondingly fixed. Currently they are a bit
> random.

Unfortunately, proposed '_pci' not anyhow better. There is Medfield
stuff and non-Medfield.
Luckily Elkhart Lake uses generic approach. That's why better to have
suffix based on platform, rather than on bus.

I think what should be done here are (in a patch per item):
1) moving to new named module (w/o mid)
2) removing mid_ prefix
3) something else I forgot?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko