On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 06:10:35PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 17:38, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 02:16:03AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > > From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > For debugging, it is useful to have access to the DSPI controller > > > signals. On the reference design board, these are exported to either the > > > mikroBUS1 or mikroBUS2 connector (according to the CPLD register > > > BRDCFG3[SPI3]). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@xxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Changes in v5: > > > None. > > > > > > Changes in v4: > > > None. > > > > > > Changes in v3: > > > None. > > > > > > Changes in v2: > > > Change compatible string for spidev node. > > > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts > > > index 6d05b76c2c7a..0d27b5667b8c 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a-rdb.dts > > > @@ -83,6 +83,20 @@ > > > }; > > > }; > > > > > > +&dspi2 { > > > + bus-num = <2>; > > > + status = "okay"; > > > + > > > + /* mikroBUS1 */ > > > + spidev@0 { > > > + compatible = "rohm,dh2228fv"; > > > > Is the compatible documented? > > > > Shawn > > > > > + spi-max-frequency = <20000000>; > > > + fsl,spi-cs-sck-delay = <100>; > > > + fsl,spi-sck-cs-delay = <100>; > > > + reg = <0>; > > > + }; > > > +}; > > > + > > > &esdhc { > > > sd-uhs-sdr104; > > > sd-uhs-sdr50; > > > -- > > > 2.17.1 > > > > > I don't really know what's the status with spidev compatibles. I do > see other device trees are using this one, I thought it should be > fine. My understanding is that every compatible needs to be documented. Shawn