On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 2:44 PM Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Independent bindings can be SPI slaves which for example is > the case for several panel bindings. > > Move SPI slave properties to spi-slave.yaml so the independent > SPI slave bindings can include spi-slave.yaml rather than > duplicating the properties. To me it seems like you are creating the common SPI slave bindings? Maybe the commit message should be about that. > + reg: > + minimum: 0 > + maximum: 256 255? Or am I wrong? Apart from that it looks good to me. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH v1 02/36] dt-bindings: spi: support non-spi bindings as SPI slaves
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/36] dt-bindings: spi: support non-spi bindings as SPI slaves
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 17:24:52 +0100
- Cc: "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian Masney <masneyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Chris Zhong <zyw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Guido Gunther <agx@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Heiko Schocher <hs@xxxxxxx>, Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hoegeun Kwon <hoegeun.kwon@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jerry Han <hanxu5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@xxxxxxx>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lin Huang <hl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-spi <linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marco Franchi <marco.franchi@xxxxxxx>, Marek Belisko <marek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nickey Yang <nickey.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>, Purism Kernel Team <kernel@xxxxxxx>, Robert Chiras <robert.chiras@xxxxxxx>, Sandeep Panda <spanda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefan Mavrodiev <stefan@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Vinay Simha BN <simhavcs@xxxxxxxxx>, Werner Johansson <werner.johansson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20200315134416.16527-3-sam@ravnborg.org>
- References: <20200315134416.16527-1-sam@ravnborg.org> <20200315134416.16527-3-sam@ravnborg.org>
- References:
- [PATCH v1 0/36] dt-bindings: display: convert remaning panel bindings to DT Schema
- From: Sam Ravnborg
- [PATCH v1 02/36] dt-bindings: spi: support non-spi bindings as SPI slaves
- From: Sam Ravnborg
- [PATCH v1 0/36] dt-bindings: display: convert remaning panel bindings to DT Schema
- Prev by Date: [PATCH v1 36/36] dt-bindings: display: convert olimex,lcd-olinuxino to DT Schema
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 04/36] dt-bindings: display: convert arm,versatile-tft-panel to DT Schema
- Previous by thread: [PATCH v1 02/36] dt-bindings: spi: support non-spi bindings as SPI slaves
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 02/36] dt-bindings: spi: support non-spi bindings as SPI slaves
- Index(es):
 |