Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Add Cadence XSPI driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The 02/10/2020 19:16, Mark Brown wrote:
EXTERNAL MAIL


On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 01:41:57PM +0100, Konrad Kociolek wrote:

 	  Enables Xilinx GQSPI controller driver for Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC.

+config SPI_CADENCE_XSPI
+	tristate "Cadence XSPI controller"
+	depends on (OF || COMPILE_TEST) && HAS_IOMEM
+	help
+	  Enable support for the Cadence XSPI Flash controller.
+
+	  Cadence XSPI is a specialized controller for connecting an SPI
+	  Flash over upto 8bit wide bus. Enable this option if you have a
+	  device with a Cadence XSPI controller and want to access the
+	  Flash as an MTD device.
+
 #
 # Add new SPI master controllers in alphabetical order above this line
 #

Please keep Kconfig and Makefile alphabetically sorted as the comment in
the context from the diff says.  :/

What I see is Kconfig is first and Makefile is second file in diff,
according to:
 drivers/spi/Kconfig            |  11 +
 drivers/spi/Makefile           |   1 +
Is that wrong?
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-xspi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,895 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ * Cadence XSPI flash controller driver

Please make the entire comment a C++ so things look more intentional.

+	dev_info(cdns_xspi->dev,
+		"Running PHY training for read_dqs_delay parameter\n");

This print is just noise, please remove it.

+static int cdns_xspi_setup(struct spi_device *spi_dev)
+{
+	if (spi_dev->chip_select > spi_dev->master->num_chipselect) {
+		dev_err(&spi_dev->dev,
+			"%d chip-select is out of range\n",
+			spi_dev->chip_select);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}

If this isn't already being validated by the core it should be and this
function can be removed.

+	irq_status = readl(cdns_xspi->iobase + CDNS_XSPI_INTR_STATUS_REG);
+	if (irq_status) {
+		writel(irq_status,
+			cdns_xspi->iobase + CDNS_XSPI_INTR_STATUS_REG);

This unconditionally acknowledges everything, even things we don't
understand.  If the hardware is generating unexpected interrupt statuses
we should probably warn.

+static void cdns_xspi_print_phy_config(struct cdns_xspi_dev *cdns_xspi)
+{
+	struct device *dev = cdns_xspi->dev;
+
+	dev_info(dev, "PHY configuration\n");
+	dev_info(dev, "   * xspi_dll_phy_ctrl: %08x\n",
+		readl(cdns_xspi->iobase + CDNS_XSPI_DLL_PHY_CTRL));
+	dev_info(dev, "   * phy_dq_timing: %08x\n",
+		readl(cdns_xspi->auxbase + CDNS_XSPI_CCP_PHY_DQ_TIMING));
+	dev_info(dev, "   * phy_dqs_timing: %08x\n",
+		readl(cdns_xspi->auxbase + CDNS_XSPI_CCP_PHY_DQS_TIMING));
+	dev_info(dev, "   * phy_gate_loopback_ctrl: %08x\n",
+		readl(cdns_xspi->auxbase + CDNS_XSPI_CCP_PHY_GATE_LPBCK_CTRL));
+	dev_info(dev, "   * phy_dll_slave_ctrl: %08x\n",
+		readl(cdns_xspi->auxbase + CDNS_XSPI_CCP_PHY_DLL_SLAVE_CTRL));
+}

This seems pretty verbose for an individual device...  If this is needed
for diagnostics perhaps put it in sysfs or debugfs where it'll be
accessible even if the log wraps?

+err_no_mem:
+	dev_err(dev, "Failed to probe Cadence XSPI controller driver\n");

Not sure this is adding anything over the individual error messages on
specific failures.

+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static const struct of_device_id cdns_xspi_of_match[] = {
+	{
+		.compatible = "cdns,xspi-nor-fpga",
+	},

Why -fpga?
This is because this driver was tested only on FPGA board.
This driver was not tested for ASIC version as PHY
initialization algorithm is differ.



--
--
Konrad Kociolek



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux