Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] spi: Add Renesas SPIBSC controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 05:25:43PM +0000, Chris Brandt wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019, Mark Brown wrote:

> > I don't really know enough about the device and there was *huge* amounts
> > of discussion which I'd have to try to page in so it'd be really good if
> > there were some agreement among those of you working with this device as
> > to what the best way forwards is.  I'm not sure any of the issues were
> > at the framework level so that's probably more sensible anyway.

> I'm trying to figure out if the differences are 'technical' or
> 'ideological' (ie, R-Car use cases vs RZ use cases).
> Of course we can do anything we want in our vendor BSPs, but I'd like
> to see a common upstream path.

That'd certainly be good to achieve.  Hopefully we can get some
agreement between everyone on what the best way forwards is.  I don't
recall any substantial framework concerns with either driver so I think
it's more a renesas question.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux