Hi Dan, On 26/11/2019 15.50, Dan Carpenter wrote: > This code triggers a static checker warning about missed error codes. > It's slightly tricky that we fall back to PIO so let's silence the > checker and add a comment for anyone who is confused. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > I won't feel offended at all if people don't think it's worth applying > this patch. > > drivers/spi/spi-pic32.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-pic32.c b/drivers/spi/spi-pic32.c > index 156961b4ca86..835380ab8bf2 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-pic32.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pic32.c > @@ -633,8 +633,10 @@ static int pic32_spi_dma_prep(struct pic32_spi *pic32s, struct device *dev) > goto out_err; > } > > - if (pic32_spi_dma_config(pic32s, DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE)) > + if (pic32_spi_dma_config(pic32s, DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE)) { > + ret = 0; /* Fall back to PIO if DMA fails. */ The 'ret' is initialized to 0 in the function to handle this. After looking at the code again I see that pic32_spi_dma_config() does error prints for failures. A comment might be enough here if it is even needed. > goto out_err; > + } > > /* DMA chnls allocated and prepared */ > set_bit(PIC32F_DMA_PREP, &pic32s->flags); > - Péter Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki