Hi Peter, On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 9:11 AM Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx> wrote: > There is no reason to use the dma_request_slave_channel_compat() as no > filter function and parameter is provided. > > Switch the driver to use dma_request_chan() instead. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-pic32.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pic32.c > @@ -609,22 +609,18 @@ static void pic32_spi_cleanup(struct spi_device *spi) > static void pic32_spi_dma_prep(struct pic32_spi *pic32s, struct device *dev) > { > struct spi_master *master = pic32s->master; > - dma_cap_mask_t mask; > > - dma_cap_zero(mask); > - dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask); > - > - master->dma_rx = dma_request_slave_channel_compat(mask, NULL, NULL, > - dev, "spi-rx"); > - if (!master->dma_rx) { > + master->dma_rx = dma_request_chan(dev, "spi-rx"); Why not dma_request_slave_channel()? That way you... > + if (IS_ERR(master->dma_rx)) { ... don't have to change the NULL check here, and... > dev_warn(dev, "RX channel not found.\n"); > + master->dma_rx = NULL; ... don't have to override by NULL here. (same for TX below). Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds