On 13-11-19, 11:42, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Hi, > > I'm going through the tree to remove dma_request_slave_channel_reason() as it > is just: > #define dma_request_slave_channel_reason(dev, name) \ > dma_request_chan(dev, name) Reviewed-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> -- ~Vinod
Re: [PATCH 0/9] spi: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] spi: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request
- From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 10:05:40 +0530
- Cc: broonie@xxxxxxxxxx, radu_nicolae.pirea@xxxxxx, shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx, s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx, agross@xxxxxxxxxx, bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx, andi@xxxxxxxxxxx, ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx, thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx, jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kgene@xxxxxxxxxx, krzk@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-tegra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20191113094256.1108-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
- References: <20191113094256.1108-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
- References:
- [PATCH 0/9] spi: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request
- From: Peter Ujfalusi
- [PATCH 0/9] spi: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 7/9] spi: s3c64xx: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 7/9] spi: s3c64xx: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request
- Previous by thread: Applied "spi: tegra114: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request" to the spi tree
- Next by thread: [PATCH] spi: tegra20-slink: add missed clk_unprepare
- Index(es):
 |