Re: [PATCH 0/6] ReST conversion patches not applied yet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Em Wed, 31 Jul 2019 21:20:07 +0100
Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:

> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 02:17:34PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> 
> > > As promised, this is the rebased version of the patches that were not applied
> > > from the /26 patch series because you had merge conflicts.
> > > 
> > > They're all based on your docs-next branch, so should apply fine.
> > > 
> > > The first one fixes all but one error with a broken reference.
> > > 
> > > The only broken reference right now is due to a DT patch with was not
> > > accepted (no idea why), but whose driver is upstream.  
> 
> > All but 5/6 applied, thanks.  
> 
> Oh, I still hadn't reviewed this version of the SPI stuff :(

It is basically the one sent on that /26 patch series, just rebased
on the top of docs-next.

> There were outstanding questions about where it was going to get moved
> to but if I read the diff correctly it looks like it didn't actually get
> moved in the end?

Yeah, it doesn't have the move. My understanding from our discussions
is that we didn't reach a conclusion.

In any case, I can send a separate patch with the move part once
we reach an agreement about what's the best way to proceed (or you
can do it directly, if you prefer so).

Thanks,
Mauro



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux