Hi Mark, the proper fix is now upstream in Torvald's tree so you can drop/revert this patch. Yours, Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH] Revert "spi: gpio: Don't request CS GPIO in DT use-case"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "spi: gpio: Don't request CS GPIO in DT use-case"
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2019 09:00:17 +0200
- Cc: "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@xxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20190701172517.31641-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
- References: <20190701172517.31641-1-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "spi: gpio: Don't request CS GPIO in DT use-case"
- From: Mark Brown
- Re: [PATCH] Revert "spi: gpio: Don't request CS GPIO in DT use-case"
- References:
- [PATCH] Revert "spi: gpio: Don't request CS GPIO in DT use-case"
- From: Linus Walleij
- [PATCH] Revert "spi: gpio: Don't request CS GPIO in DT use-case"
- Prev by Date: Re: [spi:for-5.3 41/41] drivers/spi/spi-synquacer.c:153:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'readsb'; did you mean 'readb'?
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Revert "spi: gpio: Don't request CS GPIO in DT use-case"
- Previous by thread: Applied "Revert "spi: gpio: Don't request CS GPIO in DT use-case"" to the spi tree
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Revert "spi: gpio: Don't request CS GPIO in DT use-case"
- Index(es):
 |