From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, May 10, 2019 at 3:35 PM To: Mark Brown, Benson Leung, Enric Balletbo i Serra Cc: <linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <drinkcat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Guenter Roeck, <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Douglas Anderson, <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > If a controller specifies that it needs high priority for sending > messages we should always schedule our transfers on the thread. If we > don't do this we'll do the transfer in the caller's context which > might not be very high priority. > > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > drivers/spi/spi.c | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c > index 8eb7460dd744..0597f7086de3 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c > @@ -1230,8 +1230,11 @@ static void __spi_pump_messages(struct spi_controller *ctlr, bool in_kthread) > return; > } > > - /* If another context is idling the device then defer */ > - if (ctlr->idling) { > + /* > + * If another context is idling the device then defer. > + * If we are high priority then the thread should do the transfer. > + */ > + if (ctlr->idling || (ctlr->rt && !in_kthread)) { > kthread_queue_work(&ctlr->kworker, &ctlr->pump_messages); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctlr->queue_lock, flags); > return; > -- > 2.21.0.1020.gf2820cf01a-goog >