Hi Vignesh, > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-spi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-spi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of > Naga Sureshkumar Relli > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 10:53 AM > To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>; Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx>; > broonie@xxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH] spi: spi-mem: Fix build error without CONFIG_SPI_MEM > > Hi Vignesh, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: linux-spi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > <linux-spi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of YueHaibing > > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 9:03 AM > > To: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@xxxxxx>; broonie@xxxxxxxxxx; Naga > > Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-mem: Fix build error without > > CONFIG_SPI_MEM > > > > On 2019/4/10 0:30, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: > > > On 08/04/19 8:09 PM, Yue Haibing wrote: > > >> From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >> > > >> When building with CONFIG_SPI_MEM is not set gc warns this: > > >> > > >> drivers/spi/spi-zynq-qspi.o: In function `zynq_qspi_supports_op': > > >> spi-zynq-qspi.c:(.text+0x1da): undefined reference to `spi_mem_default_supports_op' > > >> > > >> Fixes: 67dca5e580f1 ("spi: spi-mem: Add support for Zynq QSPI > > >> controller") > > >> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >> --- > > >> include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h | 14 +++++++++++--- > > >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h > > >> b/include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h index c845cd6..1941b84 100644 > > >> --- a/include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h > > >> +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h > > >> @@ -295,6 +295,10 @@ int spi_controller_dma_map_mem_op_data(struct > > >> spi_controller *ctlr, void > > >> spi_controller_dma_unmap_mem_op_data(struct spi_controller > > *ctlr, > > >> const struct spi_mem_op *op, > > >> struct sg_table *sg); > > >> + > > >> +bool spi_mem_default_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem, > > >> + const struct spi_mem_op *op); > > >> + > > >> #else > > >> static inline int > > >> spi_controller_dma_map_mem_op_data(struct spi_controller *ctlr, @@ > > >> -310,6 +314,13 @@ spi_controller_dma_unmap_mem_op_data(struct spi_controller > *ctlr, > > >> struct sg_table *sg) > > >> { > > >> } > > >> + > > >> +bool spi_mem_default_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem, > > >> + const struct spi_mem_op *op) > > > > > > This needs to be declared static inline to avoid multiple definitions. > > > Right? > > > > Indeed, thanks! Please ignore this. I did mistake in declaring. It compiled with out any issues using static inline. Thanks, Naga Sureshkumar Relli > If we declare this as static inline, then we can't access that in zynq-qspi driver. > This is the error I am getting. > In file included from drivers/spi/spi-zynq-qspi.c:19:0: > ./include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h:298:20: warning: ‘spi_mem_default_supports_op’ used but > never defined static inline bool spi_mem_default_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem, > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/spi/spi-zynq-qspi.c: In function ‘zynq_qspi_supports_op’: > ./include/linux/spi/spi-mem.h:298:20: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline > ‘spi_mem_default_supports_op’: function body not available > drivers/spi/spi-zynq-qspi.c:223:7: note: called from here > if (!spi_mem_default_supports_op(mem, op)) > > Thanks, > Naga Sureshkumar Relli > > > > > > > >> +{ > > >> + return false; > > >> +} > > >> + > > >> #endif /* CONFIG_SPI_MEM */ > > >> > > >> int spi_mem_adjust_op_size(struct spi_mem *mem, struct spi_mem_op > > >> *op); @@ -341,9 +352,6 @@ int > > >> spi_mem_driver_register_with_owner(struct spi_mem_driver *drv, > > >> > > >> void spi_mem_driver_unregister(struct spi_mem_driver *drv); > > >> > > >> -bool spi_mem_default_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem, > > >> - const struct spi_mem_op *op); > > >> - > > >> #define spi_mem_driver_register(__drv) \ > > >> spi_mem_driver_register_with_owner(__drv, THIS_MODULE) > > >> > > >> > > >