On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 01:52:42PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 11:30:01AM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > You've been sending ARM: patches to me (the SPI maintainer) and one of > > the DT maintainers. ... > Moreover, I've CC'ed developers (Esben, Andrey, Martin) involved in the > changes for previous work done in this file/driver. > And those changes are solely related to SPI work in this driver, no ARM > Vybrid. If they're SPI patches they should have a changelog that looks like a SPI patch which means that it should start with "spi" (see other patches on the list or git log for examples). When your patch subject lines start with ARM: that means they are for arch/arm - I don't 100% know but I suspect I've just not got far enough into the mails to notice that they're for SPI, people do send a lot of patches that just happen to mention buses to maintainers for those buses. In general you should try to make sure that the subject line for your patch matches the style used in the relevant subsystem. > What else shall I do? You'll need to resend the patch, preferrably with a suitable subject line.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
