Re: Regression: spi: core: avoid waking pump thread from spi_sync instead run teardown delayed

[Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 15/01/2019 15:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 02:26:02PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
>> It seems that __spi_pump_messages() is getting called several times
>> during boot when registering the spi-flash, then after the spi-flash has
>> been registered, about a 1 sec later spi_pump_idle_teardown() is called
>> (as expected), but exits because 'ctlr->running' is true. However,
>> spi_pump_idle_teardown() is never called again and when we suspend we
>> are stuck in the busy/running state. In this case should something be
>> scheduling spi_pump_idle_teardown() again? Although even if it does I
>> don't see where the busy flag would be cleared in this path?
> 
> Right, I think with the current code we just shouldn't be checking for
> busy in teardown, since there's now a fairly big delay between idle and
> actually turning the hardware off the name is just super misleading and
> the logic confused.  I don't have time to test right now but does
> something like the below which changes it to a flag for the hardware
> being powered up work:

I tried your change but the same problem still persists.

Cheers
Jon

-- 
nvpublic