Hi Hoan-san, On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 9:59 AM Nguyen An Hoan <na-hoan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Hoan Nguyen An <na-hoan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > msiof_spi_infor struct pointer was initialized in the probe() function, > no need to get back and keep consistency. > > Signed-off-by: Hoan Nguyen An <na-hoan@xxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for your patch! Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> One nit below. > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-sh-msiof.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-sh-msiof.c > @@ -1206,7 +1206,7 @@ static int sh_msiof_request_dma(struct sh_msiof_spi_priv *p) > { > struct platform_device *pdev = p->pdev; > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > - const struct sh_msiof_spi_info *info = dev_get_platdata(dev); > + const struct sh_msiof_spi_info *info = p->info; > unsigned int dma_tx_id, dma_rx_id; > const struct resource *res; > struct spi_master *master; > @@ -1469,3 +1469,4 @@ MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SuperH MSIOF SPI Master Interface Driver"); > MODULE_AUTHOR("Magnus Damm"); > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); > MODULE_ALIAS("platform:spi_sh_msiof"); > + This change is unrelated, please drop it. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds