RE: [PATCH v5 0/7] spi: add support for octal mode

[Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Boris,

Sorry for confusion.

My intention was just to point to the correct patch number only. Earlier you have asked Mark to pick the patch [1] but that patch number was not correct.

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/5/758

--
Regards
Yogesh Gaur

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boris Brezillon [mailto:boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2018 1:52 PM
> To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>; Vignesh R <vigneshr@xxxxxx>; linux-
> mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx; linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; robh@xxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx;
> shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx; frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] spi: add support for octal mode
> 
> Hi Yogesh,
> 
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 04:13:28 +0000
> Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > Patch has been resend [1], this patch is depends on the series of patch[2] and
> this series has been applied by Boris already.
> 
> You're still not asking the right person. Every patches touching things in
> drivers/mtd/ should be taken by me (or another MTD maintainer), and patches
> touching things in drivers/spi/ should be taken by Mark. So, the patch you're
> pointing to should be applied by me. Plus, I told you I would apply it after 4.21-
> rc1 because I don't want to deal with the mtd -> spi dependency.
> 
> Please be patient.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Boris