Thank you for answering. > > Is there any way to get several transfer from the framework without > > waiting to finish one to get the next even if they belongs to > > different messages? > > You'd probably want to be starting at transfer() and completely ignoring > the core message queue, trying to use the core queue and simultaneously > offload it to hardware isn't going to end well. Using trasfer() would be the best for us but we saw that the use of transfer() is deprecated while the use of core queue (transfer_one() / transfer_one_message()) is strongly advised. Is that true? Thanks in advance Mirco and Andrea