Hi, thank you for the response. On Fri, 2018-10-19 at 16:05 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 8:23 PM Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> > wrote: > > Also, the header is x86 specific, while there are non-x86 OLPC > > machines. > > Same concern. as per patch 2. Which concern? If it's that it doesn't make sense in that particular place in the patch set, then I don't think so; this header is unnecessary and the patch has no other dependencies. But the changes that enable the OLPC EC platform code depend on this. > Also, you might want to sort headers in alphabetical order. But should I? Doing so in the same commit would obscure the actual change, and a separate commit would needlessly clobber git annotate. Thank you Lubo > > Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/platform/olpc/olpc-ec.c | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/olpc/olpc-ec.c > > b/drivers/platform/olpc/olpc-ec.c > > index f99b183d5296..35a21c66cd0d 100644 > > --- a/drivers/platform/olpc/olpc-ec.c > > +++ b/drivers/platform/olpc/olpc-ec.c > > @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ > > #include <linux/module.h> > > #include <linux/list.h> > > #include <linux/olpc-ec.h> > > -#include <asm/olpc.h> > > > > struct ec_cmd_desc { > > u8 cmd; > > -- > > 2.19.0 > > > >