On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 06:34:18PM +0000, Trent Piepho wrote: > What about the calls to spi->controller->set_cs() after this? Should a > driver provided set_cs method be responsible for checking SPI_NO_CS? > Or should it not be called in the first place? This seems like something that should be done entirely in the framework, no point in every single driver having to open code the same thing. > I imagine it depends on what set_cs needs to do, which might not be > solely related to changing the CS line. It should be. If something is hanging other work on set_cs() then it's going to break.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
