RE: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: add entry for mt35xu512aba flash

[Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Tudor,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tudor Ambarus [mailto:tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 9:33 PM
> To: Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx>; linux-
> mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx; cyrille.pitchen@xxxxxxxxxx;
> boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx; computersforpeace@xxxxxxxxx;
> frieder.schrempf@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: spi-nor: add entry for mt35xu512aba flash
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/11/2018 11:15 AM, Yogesh Narayan Gaur wrote:
> > Add entry for mt35xu512aba Micron NOR flash.
> > This flash is having uniform sector erase size of 128KB, have support
> > of FSR(flag status register), flash size is 64MB and supports 4-byte
> > commands.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yogesh Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes for v2:
> > - Removed checkpatch warning, 80 character limit.
> >
> >  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> > b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c index b8b494f..e0d95ac 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> > @@ -1405,6 +1405,10 @@ static const struct flash_info spi_nor_ids[] = {
> >  	{ "n25q00a",     INFO(0x20bb21, 0, 64 * 1024, 2048, SECT_4K | USE_FSR
> | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ | NO_CHIP_ERASE) },
> >  	{ "mt25qu02g",   INFO(0x20bb22, 0, 64 * 1024, 4096, SECT_4K |
> USE_FSR | SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ | NO_CHIP_ERASE) },
> >
> > +	/* Micron */
> > +	{ "mt35xu512aba", INFO(0x2c5b1a, 0, 128 * 1024, 512,
> > +		SECT_4K | USE_FSR | SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES) },
> > +
> 
> The style is slightly different from what Brian proposed back in
> 9648388fc7737365be7a8092e77df78ccc2cd1a4. For consistency reasons, I think
> we should use the same style in all entries.
> 

Ok, I have send the next version of the patches with the style changes as proposed by Brian.

--
Regards
Yogesh Gaur.

> Since I verified the correctness of the patch and my comment targets just a
> cosmetic change, I'll let the maintainers decide:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>