On 10/3/18 5:22 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 02:12:11PM +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > >> switch (drv_data->n_bytes) { >> case 4: >> bytes_left >>= 1; >> + /* Fall through */ >> case 2: >> bytes_left >>= 1; >> } > > I think this code is just being too cute and it'd be better to just > rewrite it to directly do the expected number of shifts directly in each > case and have break statements; your fix is good but still not ideal for > readability I think. > Okay. I agree. I'll rewrite and send v2. Thanks -- Gustavo