> -----Original Message----- > From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 2018年9月30日 18:04 > To: Chuanhua Han <chuanhua.han@xxxxxxx> > Cc: broonie@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; eha@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] spi: spi-mem: Add the spi_set_xfer_bpw function > > Hi Chuanhua, > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 17:25:32 +0800 > Chuanhua Han <chuanhua.han@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Before we add this spi_transfer to the spi_message chain table, we > > need bits_per_word_mask based on spi_control to set the bits_per_word > > of this spi_transfer. > > Let's make it clearer: this is wrong. The spi-mem protocol is just using bytes, > not custom size words. Fix the fsl-dspi driver if needed, but don't try to adjust > xfer->bits_per_word in spi-mem.c, because this is inappropriate. The value of bits_per_word is only known before the spi_message_add_tail function is called, and dspi controllers only decide which mode (8bit, 16bit, or 32bit) to use for data transfer based on the value of the transfer->bits_per_word. > > Regards, > > Boris > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chuanhua Han <chuanhua.han@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes in v2: > > -The original patch is divided into multiple patches(the original > > patch theme is "spi: spi-fsl-dspi: Fix support for XSPI transport > > mode"),one of which is segmented. > > > > drivers/spi/spi-mem.c | 39 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c index > > eb72dba71d83..717e711c0952 100644 > > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c > > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c > > @@ -175,6 +175,41 @@ bool spi_mem_supports_op(struct spi_mem > *mem, > > const struct spi_mem_op *op) } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_mem_supports_op); > > > > +/** > > + * spi_set_xfer_bpw() - Set the bits_per_word for each transfer based on > > + * the bits_per_word_mask of the spi controller > > + * @ctrl: the spi controller > > + * @xfer: the spi transfer > > + * > > + * This function sets the bits_per_word for each transfer based on > > +the spi > > + * controller's bits_per_word_mask to improve the efficiency of spi > transport. > > + * > > + * Return: 0 in case of success, a negative error code otherwise. > > + */ > > +int spi_set_xfer_bpw(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_transfer > > +*xfer) { > > + if (!ctlr || !xfer) { > > + dev_err(&ctlr->dev, > > + "Fail to set bits_per_word for spi transfer\n"); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + if (ctlr->bits_per_word_mask) { > > + if (!(xfer->len % 4)) { > > + if (ctlr->bits_per_word_mask & SPI_BPW_MASK(32)) > > + xfer->bits_per_word = 32; > > + } else if (!(xfer->len % 2)) { > > + if (ctlr->bits_per_word_mask & SPI_BPW_MASK(16)) > > + xfer->bits_per_word = 16; > > + } else { > > + xfer->bits_per_word = 8; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_set_xfer_bpw); > > + > > /** > > * spi_mem_exec_op() - Execute a memory operation > > * @mem: the SPI memory > > @@ -252,6 +287,7 @@ int spi_mem_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const > struct spi_mem_op *op) > > xfers[xferpos].tx_buf = tmpbuf; > > xfers[xferpos].len = sizeof(op->cmd.opcode); > > xfers[xferpos].tx_nbits = op->cmd.buswidth; > > + spi_set_xfer_bpw(ctlr, &xfers[xferpos]); > > spi_message_add_tail(&xfers[xferpos], &msg); > > xferpos++; > > totalxferlen++; > > @@ -266,6 +302,7 @@ int spi_mem_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const > struct spi_mem_op *op) > > xfers[xferpos].tx_buf = tmpbuf + 1; > > xfers[xferpos].len = op->addr.nbytes; > > xfers[xferpos].tx_nbits = op->addr.buswidth; > > + spi_set_xfer_bpw(ctlr, &xfers[xferpos]); > > spi_message_add_tail(&xfers[xferpos], &msg); > > xferpos++; > > totalxferlen += op->addr.nbytes; > > @@ -276,6 +313,7 @@ int spi_mem_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const > struct spi_mem_op *op) > > xfers[xferpos].tx_buf = tmpbuf + op->addr.nbytes + 1; > > xfers[xferpos].len = op->dummy.nbytes; > > xfers[xferpos].tx_nbits = op->dummy.buswidth; > > + spi_set_xfer_bpw(ctlr, &xfers[xferpos]); > > spi_message_add_tail(&xfers[xferpos], &msg); > > xferpos++; > > totalxferlen += op->dummy.nbytes; > > @@ -291,6 +329,7 @@ int spi_mem_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const > struct spi_mem_op *op) > > } > > > > xfers[xferpos].len = op->data.nbytes; > > + spi_set_xfer_bpw(ctlr, &xfers[xferpos]); > > spi_message_add_tail(&xfers[xferpos], &msg); > > xferpos++; > > totalxferlen += op->data.nbytes;