Re: [PATCH v3] spi: dw: support 4-16 bits per word

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 01:23:34PM +0200, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 1:09 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Please don't send new patches in reply to old patch serieses, it makes
> > it harder to follow what the current version of things is and makes it
> > much easier for the patches to get lost in the old threads.

> Ok, no problem and thanks for the hint! Where does this requirement
> come from? Patchwork or mail sorting habits?

Mail sorting.  It can mean that you get things like someone deleting a
thread and the new patch getting caught up in a thread delete command
and hence missed.

> Anyway, how does this continue, will you pick the patch or do I need
> to somehow collect yet more reviews?

You should've got a mail at about the same time saying it's been
applied.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux