Hi Mark, On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 18:27:47 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 03:16:08PM +0200, Piotr Bugalski wrote: > > Kernel contains QSPI driver strongly tied to MTD and nor-flash memory. > > New spi-mem interface allows usage also other memory types, especially > > much larger NAND with SPI interface. This driver works as SPI controller > > and is not related to MTD, however can work with NAND-flash or other > > peripherals using spi-mem interface. > > This is fine from a SPI point of view Cool. There are still 2 things I think should be addressed before merging the driver: 1/ Fixing the SoB tag to match the author (problem reported by Alexandre) 2/ Getting this patch [1] merged and implementing the ->get_name() hook in this driver so that SPI NOR devs declared to the MTD layer keep the same name after the transition to spi-mem and mtdparts= passed on the cmdline keep working. Without this in place we're likely to break a few setups :-/. > but I'd like to apply it directly > to the SPI tree rather than ack it for merge via the MTD tree - can we > work something out with a shared branch or something? Sure, I can provide an immutable tag for you to pull and I'll add my acks on those patches once the 2 things I mentioned above are addressed. Regards, Boris [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10508693/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html