Hi Girish, On Thu, 5 Jul 2018 15:46:42 -0600 Girish Mahadevan <girishm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > + > +static int process_data(const struct spi_mem_op *op, struct qcom_qspi *ctrl) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + ctrl->xfer.dir = (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN) ? > + QSPI_READ : QSPI_WRITE; > + ctrl->xfer.mode = op->data.buswidth; > + ctrl->xfer.is_last = true; > + ctrl->xfer.rem_bytes = op->data.nbytes; > + > + if (ctrl->xfer.dir == QSPI_WRITE) > + ctrl->xfer.tx_buf = op->data.buf.out; > + else > + ctrl->xfer.rx_buf = op->data.buf.in; > + ret = qcom_qspi_pio_xfer(ctrl); > + if (ret) > + return ret; Looks like you are converting the spi_mem_op into several regular SPI transfers. Any good reasons for not relying on the core logic to do that? In this case, all you'd have to do is implement ->transfer_one() and be done with it. > + ret = wait_for_xfer(ctrl); > + return ret; > +} Regards, Boris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html