Hi Neil, On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 08:05:13 +1000 NeilBrown <neil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11 2018, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > Also, I'd prefer to have this patch split in 2: > > 1/ one patch removing the check in spi_nor_write() > > 2/ and the second patch removing the while() loop in m25p80_write() > > > > How about the following commit messages for those 2 patches: > > > > 1: > > " > > mtd: spi-nor: Support controllers with limited TX FIFO size > > > > Some SPI controllers can't write nor->page_size bytes in a single step > > because their TX FIFO is too small. > > I no longer think this is good justification for changes to m25p80 or to > anything outside the low-level SPI driver. The size of the FIFO is not > related to the maximum message size. > > An SPI transaction involves: > - asserting chip-select > - sending/receiving a bunch of bits > - deasserting chip-select > > That middle part of sending/receiving bits can be done: > - one bit at a time by bit-banging GPIOs > - 32 bytes at a time by filling a buffer, running the SPI engine, then > reading results out of the buffer (assuming a 32-byte buffer) > - with one single DMA operation if the SPI engine can DMA to/from > main memory > > and there are probably other options. > > If your SPI engine only handles (say) 32 bytes at a time, then call it > repeatedly, while holding chip-select asserted the whole time. Except you're not necessarily in control of the CS signal, and that's most of the time the case with high-level (Q)SPI mem controllers like the NXP/FSL QSPI controller (see the datasheet here if you want to check [1]). > The SPI > clock is controlled by the host and in this case it will not have a > stable frequency for the whole transaction (occasionally pauses), but > that doesn't matter. The slave just watches for the clock transitions > and don't care when they come as long as they don't come too fast. > > I recently modified the mt7621 spi driver (in drivers/staging) to work > like this and got much better throughput when reading from spi-nor flash > memory. It handles writes of full pages (36 bytes at at time!) without > problems. Just because you managed to solve the problem in one driver does not mean the problem does not exist for others. I read this datasheet [1] several times and couldn't find a way to say 'I want to keep the CS asserted between 2 transactions', so I think we really need this patch. Regards, Boris [1]https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/reference-manual/VFXXXRM.pdf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html