Hi Yogesh, On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 06:31:00 +0000 Yogesh Narayan Gaur <yogeshnarayan.gaur@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Observation 2: > > I have observed data sanity issue after performing read/write > > operations using MTD interface. Explained below > > > > root:~# mtd_debug erase /dev/mtd0 0x1000000 0x40000 > > Erased 262144 bytes from address 0x01000000 in flash --> Erase at address 0x1000000 of erase size 0x40000 > > root:~# mtd_debug read /dev/mtd0 0x0 0x100 rp > > Copied 256 bytes from address 0x00000000 in flash to rp --> Read 0x100 bytes from flash from address 0x0 in file rp > > root:~# mtd_debug write /dev/mtd0 0x1000000 0x100 rp > > Copied 256 bytes from rp to address 0x01000000 in flash --> Write 0x100 bytes to flash address 0x1000000 from file rp > > root:~# mtd_debug read /dev/mtd0 0x1000000 0x100 wp > > Copied 256 bytes from address 0x01000000 in flash to wp --> Read 0x100 bytes from flash from address 0x1000000 in file wp > > root:~# diff rp wp --> compare both rp and wp files, if they are different output comes on console stating file are different > > Files rp and wp differ > > root:~# hexdump wp > > 0000000 aa55 aa55 0000 8010 541c 4000 0040 0000 > > 0000010 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 000a > > 0000020 0000 0030 0000 0000 11a0 00a0 2580 0000 > > 0000030 0000 0000 0040 0000 005b 0000 0000 0000 > > 0000040 ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff ffff > > * > > 0000100 > > root:~# hexdump rp > > 0000000 aa55 aa55 0000 8010 541c 4000 0040 0000 > > 0000010 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 000a > > 0000020 0000 0030 0000 0000 11a0 00a0 2580 0000 > > 0000030 0000 0000 0040 0000 005b 0000 0000 0000 > > 0000040 2403 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > > 0000050 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > > * > > 0000070 0011 0000 09e7 0000 0000 4411 9555 0050 > > 0000080 0000 0000 0000 0000 f9bc afa1 0404 31e0 > > 0000090 0000 0000 0400 31e0 0000 2010 08dc 31eb > > 00000a0 2880 0050 1300 31eb 4e20 8010 0000 80ff > > 00000b0 0000 0000 beef dead beef dead beef dead > > 00000c0 beef dead beef dead beef dead beef dead > > * > > 0000100 > > root:~# > > > > In hexdump output of the file which being read from address 0x1000000,wp, it can be observed that only first 64 bytes (0x40) are written on the flash. > > > > Observation 3: > > As we can support JFFS2 filesystem on NOR flash, so we can expect JFFS2 commands should work fine on NOR flash. > > But with this driver change my mount command is not working. > > > > In my target there are 2 flash slave devices connected, and I have given argument to create MTD partition like "mtdparts=20c0000.quadspi-1:5M(rcw),10M(test),46M(rootfs) " for 2nd flash. > > Below is output for /proc/mtd commands > > root@ls1012ardb:~# cat /proc/mtd > > dev: size erasesize name > > mtd0: 04000000 00040000 "20c0000.quadspi-0" --> First 64MB flash > > mtd1: 00500000 00040000 "rcw" --> Second 64 MB flash device, 3 MTD partition are created for it. > > mtd2: 00a00000 00040000 "test" > > mtd3: 02e00000 00040000 "rootfs" > > > > root@ls1012ardb:~# mkdir /media/ram ; flash_eraseall /dev/mtd3 > > flash_eraseall has been replaced by `flash_erase <mtddev> 0 0`; please use it > > Erasing 256 Kibyte @ 0 -- 0 % complete [ 18.299929] random: crng init done > > Erasing 256 Kibyte @ 2dc0000 -- 100 % complete > > root@ls1012ardb:~# mount -t jffs2 /dev/mtdblock3 /media/ram/ > > > > This command didn't finish successfully and there are lot of messages coming on console mentioning failure in jffs2_scan_eraseblock() > > [ 187.118677] jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x013c0000: 0x2886 instead > > [ 187.128159] jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x013c0004: 0x7a3b instead > > [ 187.137641] jffs2: jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask > > 0x1985 not found at 0x013c0008: 0xb10f instead > > > > If I remove this patch series and check with older implementation, JFFS2 mounting is working fine. > > Problems 2 and 3 should definitely be fixed. That's weird because I remember that Frieder tested the new driver with a NOR chip, maybe not with JFFS2 though. > > For write issue, it would be happening due to the changes pushed in spi-mem framework. Now I understand why Frieder didn't face this issue: he was testing on an imx6 which has a 512 bytes TX FIFO, while you're probably testing on a vhybrid or layerscape platform which only has a 64 bytes TX FIFO. I think it's time to accept having partial page writes. This has come up several times (last time was [1]) and it looks like the fsl quadspi driver was already doing this sort of things (well hidden in the probe path [2] :-)). Marek, any comment on that? Regards, Boris [1]https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/905507/ [2]https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.17/source/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c#L1106 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html