On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 19:40:00 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Boris, > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 7:09 PM, Boris Brezillon > <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 16:42:26 +0200 > > Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Boris Brezillon > >> <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Add bindings for SPI NAND chips. > > >> > --- /dev/null > >> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/spi-nand.txt > >> > @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ > >> > +SPI NAND flash > >> > + > >> > +Required properties: > >> > +- compatible: should be "spi-nand" > >> > +- reg: should encode the chip-select line used to access the NAND chip > >> > + > >> > +Optional properties > >> > +- spi-max-frequency: maximum frequency of the SPI bus the chip can operate at. > >> > + This should encode board limitations (i.e. max freq can't > >> > + be achieved due to crosstalk on IO lines). > >> > + When unspecified, the driver assumes the chip can run at > >> > + the max frequency defined in the spec (information > >> > + extracted chip detection time). > >> > >> This is a standard property according to > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt. Can't you just refer > >> to that file, or just omit it, as it applies to all SPI slaves anyway? > > > > The thing is, the maximum frequency supported by a SPI NAND is directly > > encoded in the NAND device ID and can be auto-detected. Why should we > > define spi-max-frequency in the DT when we can automatically detect > > this information? The only reason one might want to override > > Because that's how we dealt with this traditionally. Or at least I thought so. > But include/linux/spi/spi.h says: > > * @max_speed_hz: Maximum clock rate to be used with this chip > * (on this board); may be changed by the device's driver. > * The spi_transfer.speed_hz can override this for each transfer. > > and many drivers seem to do so. > > > spi-max-frequency is when the board design impose such restrictions, > > hence the precision I give here. > > Which is exactly the meaning of the standard property, isn't it? > > So I think it can just be omitted here anyway. If it's present, the SPI > core will make sure it's taken into account. > > >> > +- spi-tx-bus-width: The bus width (number of data wires) that is used for MOSI. > >> > + Only encodes the board constraints (i.e. when not all IO > >> > + signals are routed on the board). Device constraints are > >> > + extracted when detecting the chip, and controller > >> > + constraints are exposed by the SPI mem controller. If this > >> > + property is missing that means no constraint at the board > >> > + level. > >> > +- spi-rx-bus-width: The bus width (number of data wires) that is used for MISO. > >> > + Only encodes the board constraints (i.e. when not all IO > >> > + signals are routed on the board). Device constraints are > >> > + extracted when detecting the chip, and controller > >> > + constraints are exposed by the SPI mem controller. If this > >> > + property is missing that means no constraint at the board > >> > + level. > >> > >> This does not match Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-bus.txt, > >> which says the default is 1. > > > > Yes, I know. > > > >> As these properties are handled by the SPI core in of_spi_parse_dt, why > >> would you want to deviate? > > > > Because, again, this information can be extracted from the NAND ID, and > > the only reason we might want to override the information extracted > > from the NAND ID is when the board design adds extra restrictions > > (like, only 2 SIO lines wired on the 4 available). > > In struct spi_device, this is specified using the SPI_[RT]_X_{DUAL,QUAD} > bits in the mode field. Documentation says: > > * @mode: The spi mode defines how data is clocked out and in. > * This may be changed by the device's driver. > * The "active low" default for chipselect mode can be overridden > * (by specifying SPI_CS_HIGH) as can the "MSB first" default for > * each word in a transfer (by specifying SPI_LSB_FIRST). > > So this may also be specified by the device driver, but it seems no driver > does so for the dual/quad bits, except for drivers/mtd/spi-nor/nxp-spifi.c > (for rx only). > > But here we do have the generic SPI DT bindings saying the default is 1. > So personally, I wouldn't go for the option of the least surprise, and > don't deviate from the generic bindings. > > >> Commenting to the question in the cover letter: what would be the > >> purpose of spi-max-bus-width? > > > > Defining how many IO lines are wired on the board design. If this > > property is missing we would assume all IO lines are wired and the > > restrictions would be negotiated between the controller and the device > > without requiring explicit description in the DT. > > Which is exactly the meaning of the standard property, except for the > default of all vs. 1. > > I'll have to defer to Mark (broonie) for his opinion about deviating from > the way this is handled traditionally, and assuming different defaults... I think I'll drop the extra description on spi-max-frequency and spi-{rx,tx}-bus-width props for now. Those are anyway not taken into account by the SPI NAND driver yet. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html