Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] spi: at91-usart: add driver for at91-usart as spi

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>]

First of all, do not remove mailing lists from Cc and people if you
are not sure they do not need your stuff.

On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:11 AM, Radu Pirea <radu.pirea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-05-13 at 16:33 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Radu Pirea <radu.pirea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > wrote:

>> > +static void at91_usart_spi_cleanup(struct spi_device *spi)
>> > +{
>> > +       struct at91_usart_spi_device *ausd = spi->controller_state;
>> > +
>> > +       if (!ausd)
>> > +               return;
>>
>> Is it even possible?
> Theoretically yes.

I would like to know real circumstances when it might happen.

>>
>> Anyway the code below will work fine even if it's the case.
>>
>> > +
>> > +       spi->controller_state = NULL;
>> > +       kfree(ausd);
>> > +}

>> The question is, why you didn't utilize what SPI core provides you?
> I tried, but it did not work the way I expected.

So, what is not going as expected in "SPI core takes care of CSs" case?
Did you use oscilloscope for that?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html