On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 05:18:08PM +0000, Trent Piepho wrote: > On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 15:49 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > Ugh. Using the whole padding is probably OK. > There could be a flag that switches delay_us from being a post xfer > delay to being a post word delay. Then no need field needs to be added. > If someone wants both a post word and post xfer delay in the same > xfer, then they'll just need to split it, which should be possible > since it must be longer than one word to need a delay after each word. > Not that great either. Yeah, that'd work too but isn't a model of elegance either. I wonder if just making a new ioctl() might not be better... not ideal either but probably cleaner.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
