On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 10:43:30AM +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote: > As a user, what prevented me from using spi_flash_read is that it > bypasses the message queue. I have a setup that uses spi_async and I > have to make sure everything goes in the right order, so I ended up > using spi_write_then_read instead. > Is there a way to make so that the message that uses exec_op are issued > in the correct order regarding messages that are already queued ? > Maybe we could extend spi_message or spi_transfer to store all > this opcode/dummy/addr information, so that we would use the standard > interfaces spi_sync / spi_async, and make this mechanism of exec_op > transparent from the user ? Or have the flash read flush out the queue perhaps, might be simpler. Pushing the memory mapped read operations through the queue does seem to defeat some of the purpose of having them though I can see it might be needed, I think the current applications were read only or at least read mostly.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
