Hi Dirk, On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 8:19 AM, Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03.01.2018 18:25, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven >> <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>>> On 07.09.2017 10:59, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On 07.09.2017 10:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>>>>>> Sounds OK. Have you tested this? >>>>>> >>>>>> I tested all 8 patches together if they fix the issues I observed with >>>>>> plain >>>>>> mainline. >>>>> >>>>> Could you please elaborate about the issues you observed with plain >>>>> mainline? >>>>> It may help to identify which patches are responsible for fixing them. >>>> >>>> I've been told that an easy test case is to just cat random data (any >>>> mid >>>> sized file) into SPI. E.g.: >>>> >>>> # cat /proc/cpuinfo > /dev/spidev32764.2 >>>> [ 504.544948] spi_sh_msiof e6e90000.spi: failed to shut down hardware >>>> [ 504.551265] spidev spi32764.2: SPI transfer failed: -110 >>>> [ 504.556625] spi_master spi32764: failed to transfer one message from >>>> queue >>>> [ 504.564857] spi_sh_msiof e6e90000.spi: failed to shut down hardware >>>> [ 504.571177] spidev spi32764.2: SPI transfer failed: -110 >>>> [ 504.576528] spi_master spi32764: failed to transfer one message from >>>> queue >>>> cat: write error: Connection timed out >>>> >>>> done on plain 4.13-rc6. >>> >>> Thank you, that's very valuable information! >>> We'll give it a try... >> >> After some investigation, this is caused by DMA completion triggering >> too early for TX-only transfers. This should indeed be fixed by "[PATCH >> 5/8] >> spi: sh-msiof: Wait for Tx FIFO empty after DMA" you extracted from the >> BSP. >> >> As that patch needs changes to apply (a) on current spi/for-next and (b) >> without other patches from your series, I reworked it into "[PATCH] spi: >> sh-msiof: Fix timeout failures for TX-only DMA transfers". >> >> As for the other patches from your series: >> - Upstream already has commit 36735783fdb599c9 ("spi: sh-msiof: Fix DMA >> transfer size check"), >> - spi/for-next has commit b8761434bdec32fa ("spi: sh-msiof: Implement >> cs-gpios configuration"). >> The remaining were either rejected, retracted, or it is unclear which >> problem >> (if any) they are really fixing. > > First, many thanks for looking into this! > >> Do you agree? > > If there are no more issues, then I agree ;) So lets rephrase that a little: > We'll test what we have, now. And in case we find any remaining issues, > we'll come back with more details, then. What will help us to look at the > remaining patches. Sure, if more issues can be identified, we should look into fixing them as well. Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html